<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who? Me?&#8230;PDMWorks Enterprise API Development Gotchas With .NET</title>
	<atom:link href="http://extensiblecad.com/words/2008/06/18/who-mepdmworks-enterprise-api-development-gotchas-with-net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://extensiblecad.com/words/2008/06/18/who-mepdmworks-enterprise-api-development-gotchas-with-net/</link>
	<description>SolidWorks and PDMWorks Enterprise Development Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 12:31:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Cope</title>
		<link>http://extensiblecad.com/words/2008/06/18/who-mepdmworks-enterprise-api-development-gotchas-with-net/comment-page-1/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Cope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://extensiblecad.com/words/?p=99#comment-291</guid>
		<description>Thanks Phillip.  Yes.  PDMWE definitely steps it up a level or two from PDMWW.  Workgroup is a good tool for what it was designed for but Enterprise is simply one of the most well-designed pieces of software I have ever used.  It is almost up there with Winzip.  

I would be happy to present this wherever people want the information.  This is probably a little too specific for a users group or even a technical summit though.  I think this is good for SolidWorks world and that is probably about it.  I don&#039;t think you will get enough people for such a specific topic at any other venu.

I didn&#039;t make the cut at last year&#039;s conference but here&#039;s looking to next year : ).  It is sounding promising based on the comments of the SolidWorks folks.  I hope so because there really wasn&#039;t enough attention given to PDMWe in terms of the number of presentations last time.  We will do our best to fix that!

Thanks again for reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Phillip.  Yes.  PDMWE definitely steps it up a level or two from PDMWW.  Workgroup is a good tool for what it was designed for but Enterprise is simply one of the most well-designed pieces of software I have ever used.  It is almost up there with Winzip.  </p>
<p>I would be happy to present this wherever people want the information.  This is probably a little too specific for a users group or even a technical summit though.  I think this is good for SolidWorks world and that is probably about it.  I don&#8217;t think you will get enough people for such a specific topic at any other venu.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t make the cut at last year&#8217;s conference but here&#8217;s looking to next year : ).  It is sounding promising based on the comments of the SolidWorks folks.  I hope so because there really wasn&#8217;t enough attention given to PDMWe in terms of the number of presentations last time.  We will do our best to fix that!</p>
<p>Thanks again for reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ Way</title>
		<link>http://extensiblecad.com/words/2008/06/18/who-mepdmworks-enterprise-api-development-gotchas-with-net/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://extensiblecad.com/words/?p=99#comment-290</guid>
		<description>Jeff,
I would agree with Joy. I think this would be a valuable presentation. Would you condiser presenting at a Users Group meeting in the future? This is valuable information. I am currently pursuing PDMWE as a solution and have stretched the capabilities of PDMWW and have reached it&#039;s limit I think. Please feel free to contact me through my provided email address. Thanks
PJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,<br />
I would agree with Joy. I think this would be a valuable presentation. Would you condiser presenting at a Users Group meeting in the future? This is valuable information. I am currently pursuing PDMWE as a solution and have stretched the capabilities of PDMWW and have reached it&#8217;s limit I think. Please feel free to contact me through my provided email address. Thanks<br />
PJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Cope</title>
		<link>http://extensiblecad.com/words/2008/06/18/who-mepdmworks-enterprise-api-development-gotchas-with-net/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Cope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://extensiblecad.com/words/?p=99#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Thanks Brian.  I am glad I could help you out.  If you have any good tips you would ever like to share then let me know and I would be happy to let you post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Brian.  I am glad I could help you out.  If you have any good tips you would ever like to share then let me know and I would be happy to let you post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Titus</title>
		<link>http://extensiblecad.com/words/2008/06/18/who-mepdmworks-enterprise-api-development-gotchas-with-net/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Titus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://extensiblecad.com/words/?p=99#comment-287</guid>
		<description>Awesome post.  I&#039;m currently working on a PDMWE app and got caught by some of these....Thanks and keep up the good work...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome post.  I&#8217;m currently working on a PDMWE app and got caught by some of these&#8230;.Thanks and keep up the good work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orcmid</title>
		<link>http://extensiblecad.com/words/2008/06/18/who-mepdmworks-enterprise-api-development-gotchas-with-net/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>orcmid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://extensiblecad.com/words/?p=99#comment-286</guid>
		<description>Thanks to Silvain&#039;s tweet, I have found this article and added it to a currently-short list of .NET Interop resources on the Interoperability Forum: http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=3512468&amp;SiteID=1

Jeff Says:  Thank you orcmid.  That is pretty cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Silvain&#8217;s tweet, I have found this article and added it to a currently-short list of .NET Interop resources on the Interoperability Forum: <a href="http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=3512468&#038;SiteID=1" rel="nofollow">http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=3512468&#038;SiteID=1</a></p>
<p>Jeff Says:  Thank you orcmid.  That is pretty cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

